JanPulse turns live communities — students, workers, consumers — into continuous, hyperlocal intelligence. AI-native conversations in people's own language, anchored to a living profile, fused with validated behavioural frameworks.
Market Research + Our AI = Market Intelligence
Policy Expertise + Our AI = Policy Intelligence


Built on the Livelihood Intelligence experience of Sapio Analytics.
Rebuilding Government for the Age of Intelligent Machines
AI will reshape every government on earth. The only question is whether it rebuilds them, or just speeds up what is already broken. Modern governments hold more data, technology and expertise than ever, yet citizens remain invisible to the systems meant to serve them — and policies fail despite good intentions. The book argues for institutions that can see, remember and learn.
Paperback ₹590 · Hardcover ₹750 · Notion Press, Amazon.in and Flipkart.
Research was an event that ended in a PDF. Intelligence is a product that compounds.
We are building the category. Pulse on people, multiplied by AI.
AI-native conversations with real people — students, workers, consumers — in their language, at their moment.
Every dialogue enriches a living profile: livelihood, aspiration, behaviour, spend, sentiment, context.
Profiles flow into models that fuse pulse-data with validated research frameworks and prior intelligence.
Hyperlocal, contextual intelligence — piped as briefs, dashboards and API into partner products.
The loop compounds: every conversation makes every future insight sharper. This is our moat.
Continuous AI-native engagement across live communities — students, workers, consumers.
Livelihood, consumer and policy frameworks baked in from Sapio's institutional work.
Every past conversation, every profile, every model output — reusable across new studies.
Prior profiles pre-answer half the study before it starts.
AI-native capture beats field-panel unit economics 5–10×.
Frameworks + base data lift raw responses into structured intelligence.
Competitors can copy the survey; they can't copy the compounding profile graph.
Every organisation has an invisible population — informal workers, non-customers, employees whose real concerns never reach leadership. JanPulse builds on population-intelligence methodologies developed for public-sector initiatives in Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, designed to discover the realities conventional systems miss.
Administrative records capture education, occupation and residence. They rarely capture aspiration, the barriers in front of it, nearby employer demand, or the specific pathway that would change a livelihood. Treated as a one-off report, that gap is invisible; multiplied across thousands of households, it becomes an institutional intelligence problem.
The method: adaptive questionnaires, multimodal listening, contextual inference, response-quality signals, and continuity after the census closed.
Establishment-centric statistics miss household trading, home-based production, informal services and seasonal work. Two people recorded under the same occupation can face entirely different customer networks, costs, supply chains and credit needs.
The method: household-first discovery, hyperlocal context, rich economic profiles, derived estimates with stated uncertainty, permissioned access.
Together they form the methodological pedigree for JanPulse: discovering missing voices, combining them with context, stating confidence, and turning signals into decisions.
Every data point we collect is anchored to a rich, living profile — so raw responses become predictive intelligence, not noise.
Sentiment, hedging language and response timing read against validated valence–arousal models — capturing signal respondents don't state outright. This is the layer that is measured, published and open to inspection.
Institutionally validated frameworks that structure every raw response into predictive behavioural signal.
Statistical machinery that fuses profile and response into insights that hold up in real policy, market and product decisions.
The unique marriage of behavioural and affective science with deep-tech statistical algorithms — paired with the pedigree of reaching billions across the developing world.
Most sentiment tooling returns a label with no way to check it. Ours returns numbers on a named psychological model (Russell's Circumplex), a second deterministic method as a control, and blind human ratings on the same 30 responses — scored by two independent raters.
| Axis | Model r | 95% CI | n | Human ceiling | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valence | +0.96 | [+0.92, +0.98] | 30 | +0.88 | At the ceiling. The raters agree strongly, and the model matches what they can agree on. |
| Arousal | +0.49 | [+0.16, +0.72] | 30 | +0.71 | Below the ceiling — this is model work, not ambiguity in the measure. |
| Hedging | +0.81 | [+0.64, +0.91] | 30 | +0.31 | The raters agree only weakly on this axis, so the model's score is not claimed as validated. The rubric is being tightened and the axis re-rated. |
| Lexicon control | +0.17 | [-0.20, +0.50] | 30 | — | A cheap deterministic word-lookup does not work here: not distinguishable from zero, and it contradicted the sign of the human mean on 14 of the 30 responses. |
What the ceiling means. Two humans rated the same responses independently. How well they agree with each other is the ceiling: a model cannot be judged against an axis the raters themselves score differently. Valence 0.88 · arousal 0.71 · hedging 0.31.
What we are not claiming. n = 30 with two raters is an indicative measurement, not proof. A second pair of raters would tighten each ceiling. The LLM scorer is not fully deterministic, moving correlations by roughly 0.05 run to run. The lexicon control is licensed for research use and is not part of any shipped product.
The rating sheet at /rate.html is the same blind instrument the raters
used: no model scores are shown, your name is required, blanks stay blank, and the ratings export as
CSV that the harness re-runs against.
They don't know if a product will sell in a location — or what will make it sell.
JanPulse reveals what can sell in each locality, and how the consciousness and behaviour of the people shape what actually works.
No tender, plan or policy should be designed without access to sovereign AI grounded in the citizens it will serve.
A foundational model reflecting unique socio-economic, cultural and linguistic profiling — for consultants, bureaucrats and tender design.
Real surveys cannot be replaced by models that hallucinate and simulate.
JanPulse doesn't hallucinate: it gets into the mind of the respondent, knows their pulse, and responds on their behalf from continuous ground data.
An educational institute with hundreds of thousands of students, turned into a live intelligence engine — ready to be initiated post funding.
Revenue: institute subscription + parent-facing intelligence product + brand data-licensing (edtech, publishing, D2C, financial services).
A language training institute — students learning new languages to work abroad — becomes a live, contextual research panel. Ready to be initiated post funding.
Buyers: remittance platforms · NBFCs & lenders · forex and travel cards · insurance · D2C brands · recruiters.
Earnings volatility, credit appetite, brand affinity — for lenders, insurers, employers.
Livelihood pulse for FMCG, agri-inputs, financial inclusion and welfare design.
Patient panels for pharma, diagnostics and public-health institutions.
Real-time sentiment and demand signals for policy and B2B suppliers.
Both are demo-ready and sit on the same rails: every new deployment enriches the base intelligence.
Mass-context market research across the developing world, plus ~1% of people-impacting government policy budgets.
Mass-context research spend across India, SE Asia, Africa and LATAM.
Buyers: consumer brands, financial services, edtech, D2C, pharma, agri.
Roughly 1% of major people-impacting government policy budgets across the developing world.
Buyers: government consultants, bureaucracies, tender designers, advisories.
TAM figures are the founders' estimates of addressable spend today, not bookings.
Client-briefed studies executed on top of the model — ground reports delivered from the field within weeks. Immediate revenue, immediate data deposits into the base intelligence layer.
A sovereign AI model grounded in citizen pulse, queried by researchers, consultants, brands and governments as a paid service. All four revenue lines go live here.
Step 1 funds the build. Step 2 compounds it into a category-defining intelligence layer.
₹15L–₹50L per engagement
Standing up JanPulse inside a partner community — institute, workforce, cohort. Covers integration, training and first intelligence delivery.
Annual contracts
Recurring dashboards and briefs for the deploying partner and its stakeholder ecosystem.
Per study, premium
Client-briefed studies executed on top of base intelligence — priced higher because prior data pre-answers half the study.
Usage-based
Anonymised intelligence licensed to consumer brands, financial services, remittance, insurance and policy buyers.
Every rupee of revenue also deposits data into the base intelligence layer. Revenue and moat grow together.
LLMs make continuous, multilingual, contextual conversation cheap. Gathering insight stops feeling like a survey and starts feeling like a chat.
Institutes, training academies, gig platforms and workforces all run on mobile. Deployment inside a community is a distribution problem we can solve.
Brands, lenders, remittance players, edtech and policy institutions are done with stale panels. They want live, hyperlocal, defensible intelligence.
Sovereign AI · Behavioural science · Patents & frameworks
IIT BombayMumbai LinkedIn →
Civil services · Consciousness science · Population-scale data
Sovereign data pedigree + consciousness science + behavioural AI — the exact stack JanPulse needs. Built by them before.
Track 1 — 12 months to move JanPulse from two demo deployments to a piloted, revenue-generating AI-native market intelligence platform, using services revenue that starts in month 1 alongside the pre-seed.
Track 2 — once the AI model is initiated by month 3, an additional raise is planned that does not disturb Track 1, with funds generated by month 6 for a stronger foundational model.
| Platform & AI build — conversational engine, profile graph, framework layer | 35% |
| Deployments — taking the two demo use cases into live delivery | 25% |
| Content & category — public voice, category creation, buyer education | 20% |
| Team & operations — founding hires across engineering and analysis | 15% |
| Legal, compliance & buffer — data governance and privacy foundations | 5% |
We are a pre-revenue, pre-product company with access to the raw materials and
servicing capabilities required to build the product and generate revenue, with the pedigree of
products and businesses built by the founders. We invite partners who can build this into a
$10B company* in the next ten years.
*The $10B roadmap is in progress
and will be shared on request.
A new form of market and policy research — backed by base intelligence, validated frameworks, consciousness algorithms, and a living pulse on people.
Ashwin Srivastava — Founder & CEO, Sapio Analytics · Prashant Nikam — Co-Founder, JanPulse